mon 24/09/2018

Victorian Giants, National Portrait Gallery review - pioneers of photography | reviews, news & interviews

Victorian Giants, National Portrait Gallery review - pioneers of photography

Victorian Giants, National Portrait Gallery review - pioneers of photography

Artistic searches, technical advances fuel the discoveries of the Victorian age

Alice Liddell by Lewis Carroll, 1858, detail

It is a very human crowd at Victorian Giants: The Birth of Art Photography. There are the slightly melancholic portraits of authoritative and bearded male Victorian eminences, among them Darwin, Tennyson, Carlyle and Sir John Herschel. The Victorians invented and eulogised childhood, so we see a procession of children, including the inspirational Alice of Alice in Wonderland and her siblings, bathed in a kind of wondering innocence that is later echoed by some gorgeous young women. It is the Victorian age in full flow, gleaming from the walls of the National Portrait Gallery in the gradated sepia or silvery tones of brilliantly detailed photographs.

From the discovery of photography, at some point in the late 1820s, with the chemical fixing on a paper, glass or metal surface of a world observed through mechanical lenses, the new medium embraced any scientific advance that came its way, vastly accelerating its progress until it became the mass medium that we know today. But in the 19th century, photography must have seemed as astonishing to its practitioners and audience then as digital does to us today. Technology is not always an advance, however, and photography’s relation to art was always complicated: historical photography’s detailed beauties are now subsumed into digital, which does not approach as yet the aesthetic quality of such earlier forms.

Mountain Nymph, Sweet Liberty by Julia Margaret Cameron, 1866For the quartet of artists at Victorian Giants, it was the wet collodion method of developing negatives and also albumen prints invented in the 1850s – there is an excellent show-and-tell video in the show – that enabled the creation of these images. The processes and materials were elaborate and painstaking, as careful as the relatively long exposures required in early photography that is vital for understanding the careful thought behind the images: we are decades before the ability to take snapshots, although manipulation in the darkroom is as old as photography.

The work of these four artists offers a fascinating insight into the visual preoccupations of 19th century Britain. They were, in different ways, at the heart of the establishment: photography was expensive at the time, and required other necessities not given to all, such as suitable premises, and lots of time. The new medium had royal approval, with Prince Albert himself pioneering its potential as a reproductive medium to bring the images of great art – painting and sculpture – to the masses, while the royal couple themselves commissioned work. (The NPG has cleverly worked with its new patron the Duchess of Cambridge, an enthusiastic photographer herself, to publicise this exhibition.)Two ways of Life by Oscar Rejlander, 1856-7These photographers was relatively privileged. Only the mysterious Swedish emigré Oscar Rejlander (1813-1875) would be called a professional. Julia Margaret Cameron (1815-1879) was one of the famous Pattle sisters, and took up photography in her 40s, encouraged by her family desperate that she use up some of her inexhaustible energy, and turn her domestic scrutiny outwards (top picture, Mountain Nymph, Sweet Liberty, 1866). She went on not only to have her work collected from the 1850s by the Victoria and Albert Museum, but to act effectively as the museum’s first photographer in residence.

Clementina, Lady Hawarden (1822-1865) photographed her family, in particular her daughters, not a stone’s throw from the new museum. She has only relatively recently been rediscovered, with a V&A exhibition some 20 years ago, to enter the ever-expanding canon of significant photographers (pictured below, Photographic Study (Clementina and Isabella Grace Maude, 1863-4). Lewis Carroll (1832-1898), the Oxford mathematics don world famous as the author of Alice in Wonderland, has received a lot of attention for his passion for photography, some of it suspicious because of his frequent choice of pre-pubescent girls as subjects (although they were almost invariably chaperoned: main picture, Alice Liddell, 1858)

Photographic Study (Clementina and Isabella Grace Maude) by Clementina Hawarden, 1863-4This fascinating quartet all knew each other, and all were taught to a varying degree by Rejlander. There is an 1857 self-portrait by Lewis Carroll – what a hair-do! – and a portrait of Carroll from six years later with even more elaborate curls, his expression wistful as he almost caresses a camera lens, by Rejlander. The group moved in intersecting circles: both Cameron and Carroll photographed the young Ellen Terry, who was briefly married to the artist GF Watts, 30 years her senior, with both part of the Holland House set that was at the centre of English intellectual and political life. Cameron photographed Watts too, and also depicted Alice Liddell in the guise of various mythical characters.

Some of their work seems to our taste now risibly melodramatic. Myth brings out the worst – Rejlander’s The Evening Sun (Iphigenia) – even more so especially when the photographer attempts an ensemble that is imitative of Renaissance composition. Rejlander’s Two Ways of Life (centre picture) is beloved because of his innovative combinations of some 30 negatives (he has been nicknamed the father of Photoshop). Its rather outlandish human spectacle certainly pre-empts Cecil B DeMille and epic silent movies, now appearing endearingly ridiculous. Yet he can use existing paintings to advantage in a rather straightforward Non Angeli sed Angli (Not Angels but English) image of two plump-faced baby angels lifted directly from the winged cherubs of Raphael’s Sistine Madonna.

Anonymous servants, family members, friends and acquaintances were also pressed into acting as models for mythological characters, riffing on the knowledge of the classics that these Victorians could almost take for granted. This exhibition seamlessly presents two contrasting sides to Victorian preoccupations: the acting out of classical myths, and the passion for portraying real people. The mythical poses may seem now a tad too melodramatic, but the incisive thoughtful portraits of real people make for an informative and captivating exhibition.

The exhibition presents two contrasting Victorian preoccupations: the acting out of classical myths, and portraying real people

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters