sun 18/08/2019

The Living and the Dead, Series Finale, BBC One | reviews, news & interviews

The Living and the Dead, Series Finale, BBC One

The Living and the Dead, Series Finale, BBC One

Gripping conclusion to time-travelling supernatural thriller

Days of future past: Colin Morgan and Charlotte Spencer as the ill-starred Applebys

If Ashley Pharoah's superior chiller began with its 19th century protagonist, Nathan Appleby, trying to apply science and reason to seemingly irrational events, by the end of this sixth and final episode he had strayed way beyond the outer limits. Not only had the murky past of the Somerset village of Shepzoy reared up in numerous terrifying manifestations, but Nathan and his wife Charlotte were also receiving vivid and disturbing flashes into the future.

To a soundtrack of eerie old English balladry, we've already had a parade of demonic possession, hauntings and murder. Last week, Shepzoy was overpowered by a full-scale onslaught of ghostly Roundhead cavalrymen, the air filled with sounds of screaming, galloping horses and gunfire as the apocalyptic horsemen replayed the Allhallows Massacre, when the villagers were slaughtered en masse, many of them slit open and hanged from trees. Visions of the latter materialised with horrific intensity, even reducing the vicar, Matthew Denning (Nicholas Woodeson), to the verge of a hysterical breakdown.

However, the vicar had been impeded in his mission to exorcise whatever malign forces had Shepzoy in their grip by Nathan's ever-growing obsession with his dead son, Gabriel, drowned in the local pond some years earlier. Visions of the boy (a rather dour and sulky-looking youth, it must be said) keep popping up all over the place, not least in the background of one of Charlotte's photographs, with the guilt-riven Nathan being drawn by the boy's seemingly malign spirit into a suicidal altered state.

This finale opened with a bold leap into the present day, where we learned the identity of the lady in the red anorak who has been appearing regularly to Nathan (did I detect echoes of Nic Roeg's Don't Look Now?). She's his great-great-granddaughter, Lara (Chloe Pirrie), who'd recently given birth to a baby daughter but was being stalked by the ghost of Gabriel – as her grandmother had also been, it seems. Convinced that she was not suffering from post-partum psychosis after all, as the shrinks had been telling her, she dashed off to the old house in Shepzoy to try to get to the root of it all, aided by a suitcase full of old letters and clippings donated by her grandmother.

So, as we had already gleaned, the recurring drawing of a figure holding a "book of light" which Nathan had found so perplexing was Lara with her iPad, while the vehicle headlights which almost ran him down in episode one belonged to Lara's Golf GTI, making a surprise detour to 1894. While Gabriel was trying to drag Nathan into the darkness, Lara had an opportunity to warn Charlotte that her husband was rapidly running out of road.

The acting might well attract a few gongs. As Nathan, Colin Morgan's progress from calm control through progressive stages of unhingedness has been quite gruelling to watch, while Charlotte Spencer's Charlotte travelled from skittish girlishness to a last-ditch do-or-die determination to save her husband and her marriage.

Some of the plot's more fanciful escapades wouldn't have worked nearly as well without some brilliant production design. Scenes of village life or workers in the fields were shot and lit with a super-sensitive eye for colour and texture. Bright wintry landscapes were counterpointed against gloomy, rainy days tinted in greys and browns, while glorious widescreen shots gave us vivid blue skies and an array of spectacular dawns and sunsets. Last week's corpses-in-the-woods sequence was rendered genuinely shocking by some spiralling, low-angle camerawork and ghoulish lighting. 

It ended with a brisk double-punch. While it seeemed for an idyllic moment as though Charlotte and Nathan had found a way through the mire, the final shot was an admonitory "not so fast, Mr Appleby" moment. Series two, anyone?

@SweetingAdam

Some of the plot's more fanciful escapades wouldn't have worked nearly as well without some brilliant production design

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

Please have a second series.... so many unanswered questions ..... loved the series.

Cliche piled upon cliche.  Horror story or comic story.  Perhaps horror comic story.  Absolute balderdash!

 

it started off so well but the last episode descended into farce. The idea of pulling a car from the mud in Victorian England was stupid. The stories from the past, like the young boys in the mine were excellent but time travel was a step too far.

I loved this drama, all the actors were brilliant, but the end episode was a bit disappointing. 

last episode was ridiculous! Where was Doctor Who 

Had it sussed in episode one when Nathan saw aircraft con-trails in the sky.  (Not like the 70's period dramas that couldn't photoshop them out).  Anyone who has seen "The Others"  or too many episodes of "The X-Files" would have been thinking along the same lines too.  However, interesting series leaving many unanwered questions (like the car in the bog  -touches of "Life On Mars"  or "Lost" perhaps??)  Hope there's a second series.

The whole village were ghosts in the present day. Their encounters with the 21st century by way of aircraft noises, car headlights and i-pads was pointing in that direction. The wrecked car at the end had not gone back in time, but was being discovered by the ghosts of the village in the present time. Were these villagers those that had been massacred by the Roundheads and already ghosts in the Victorian era? The final scene implied that Nathan Appleby had killed his wife and then himself so that in the end they too joined the ghostly villagers. Anyway that is my interpretation which is as wacky as any other, but it was a thoroughly enjoyable series.

Your theory actually makes sense. Seeing ghosts is, to some, a bit far-fetched. Finding a 21st century car in the 19th century is miles beyond that. I wish, however, there would be a second series to explain the final scene in episode 6.

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters