wed 11/12/2024

The Effect, National Theatre | reviews, news & interviews

The Effect, National Theatre

The Effect, National Theatre

Billie Piper stars in Enron playwright Lucy Prebble’s stimulating, compelling and moving new play

Happy pills or natural attraction? Billie Piper and Jonjo O'Neill in 'The Effect'Ellie Kurtz

Science thrives on stage. In play after play, various scientific ideas seem to flourish in the warm, well-lit environment of the theatre, fed by a crew of artists and despite the threats of critics or other predators. Now, Lucy Prebble — fresh from her outstanding success with Enron — turns her attention to the subject of love and neurology in her latest play, which opened last night.

Directed by Enron maestro Rupert Goold, the play stars Billie Piper so it’s already sold out, but is it any good?

The short answer is yes. For a longer answer, read on. The Effect is set in a facility managed by Raushen, a pharmaceutical company which is running clinical trials of a new dopamine-heavy drug that could cure depression. The experiment is a four-week residential test with strict rules. Prebble focuses on two young volunteers: Connie (Piper) and Tristan. They are from different backgrounds: she is a psychology student from Basingstoke while he is a drifter from Coleraine.

A super-Prozac pill is the holy grail of neuroscience

As the intensive experiment progresses, Connie and Tristan are attracted to each other. But is this the result of the happy pills they have been popping, or is it a natural attraction? And how could you tell the difference? Can an experience as life-changing as falling in love be just a side effect? To complicate matters, Prebble throws in that essential element in any blind scientific test, the placebo. Now, which of the two volunteers is taking the placebo, and how does that alter what they think they are feeling?

It has to be said that the premise of the play is fascinating, immediately engrossing. In the past, people thought that the soul dwelt in the spleen, but today we are more likely to believe that the mind resides in the brain. And that all neurological problems, including the devastating disability of depression, are caused by chemical imbalances. In two matching mini-lectures by the two doctors in the story — Dr Lorna James and Dr Toby Sealey — the brain, perhaps the most complex object in the known world, is intellectually dissected.

Of course, the human element is stressed. By giving in to their mutual attraction, Connie and Tristan are breaking the rules of the experiment, much to the dismay of Dr James. She not only tries to control their natural, or drug-induced, urges but she also comes into conflict with Dr Sealey, who believes that a super-Prozac pill is the holy grail of neuroscience. Her attitude is more nuanced, and influenced by her own experience of depression. If love is a drug, sadness is a human curse.

As in Enron, Prebble writes with a really impressive command of complex ideas, and her mix of the personal and the political is here nearly perfect. Okay, you could object that they situation is too simplistic, too much like Peter Shaffer’s Equus, but it never feels unsophisticated or jejune. Prebble also chucks in plenty of satirical asides, and there are many fascinating nuggets of information and good jokes. There are oblique references to the Renaissance idea of love as madness and perceptive one liners such as “The history of medicine is the history of placebo”.

The debate between the two doctors is well balanced and Prebble gives both sides equal weight. The result is humane and compelling. At first I thought that the final 20 minutes of a long evening was a plot twist too far, but actually they turn into a very moving note of healing, of quiet and touching human connection. This is all greatly enhanced by Rupert Goold who — with designer Miriam Buether — has created a chic clinical environment, bland yellow and passionate red, and often covered in projections that convey the abstractions of modern medicine.

But the best aspect of the production is the acting. Billie Piper and Jonjo O’Neill deliver beautifully contrasting performances as Connie and Tristan (pictured above right with Anastasia Hille). Piper makes a convincing journey from light-hearted frivolity to emotionally devastated understanding, while he changes from a mouthy and charming youth to a prematurely aged victim. Likewise, Anastasia Hille is brilliant as Dr James, strict, arid but finally deeply human. And as Dr Sealey, Tom Goodman-Hill (pictured above left) is all efficiency, before the doubts overwhelm him. Together, they create an intensive, stimulating and moving evening in what might well be the best new play of the year. That’s what I felt when I left the theatre — surely it couldn’t have just been a temporary chemical imbalance, could it?

Prebble writes with a really impressive command of complex ideas, and her mix of the personal and the political is here nearly perfect

rating

Editor Rating: 
5
Average: 5 (1 vote)

Share this article

Comments

There is no such place as County Coleraine. Coleraine is a town in County Derry, Northern Ireland.

Thanks for the correction Basa.

Though I enjoyed the play, I think it is a mistake to say that Prebbles dealt with both sides of the debate equally. The "chemical imbalance" argument, advanced by Big Pharma, is cogently presented and intelligently trashed. The counter to that argument is -- what? Nuance? "Human curse?" That there are no societal alternatives to pill popping is never discussed. Talk therapy and natural alternatives to drugs are similarly left on the cutting floor. The political is overwhelmed by the personal, a tragedy the play cannot claim.

Though I enjoyed the play, I think it is a mistake to say that Prebbles dealt with both sides of the debate equally. The "chemical imbalance" argument, advanced by Big Pharma, is cogently presented and intelligently trashed. The counter to that argument is -- what? Nuance? "Human curse?" That there are no societal alternatives to pill popping is never discussed. Talk therapy and natural alternatives to drugs are similarly left on the cutting floor. The political is overwhelmed by the personal, a tragedy the play cannot claim.

Add comment

The future of Arts Journalism

 

You can stop theartsdesk.com closing!

We urgently need financing to survive. Our fundraising drive has thus far raised £33,000 but we need to reach £100,000 or we will be forced to close. Please contribute here: https://gofund.me/c3f6033d

And if you can forward this information to anyone who might assist, we’d be grateful.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters