Straw Dogs | reviews, news & interviews
Straw Dogs
Straw Dogs
Pale remake of Peckinpah's Seventies provocation
As this remake’s director Rod Lurie, a former film journalist, well knows, competing with Sam Peckinpah is a loser’s game. His films are no more replicable than a Fred Astaire musical, inseparable from their demonic creator.
I saw Straw Dogs in the Nineties when its long cinema ban finished, alongside its fellow scandals of the “Savage Seventies”, A Clockwork Orange and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The rape of Susan George’s character by her ex-boyfriend, which she plainly starts to enjoy until it becomes a gang-rape, cost its certificate. The notorious scene was defensible because the mingled sex and sexual violence, arousal curdling into almost unwatchable brutality, made me think and feel so much, letting loose strong sensations the mind struggled to control. Peckinpah’s misogyny was objectionable, but alive with its director’s (and George’s) visceral fearlessness.
Watch a clip from Peckinpah's 1971 Straw Dogs
No, Lurie doesn’t compete with that. Instead, every decision he makes domesticates Straw Dogs. Peckinpah, himself a stranger in a strange land, turned Cornishmen into Apache-style “savages”, with Hoffman a maddened lone cavalryman; alienation for British viewers, too, watching local character actors imitate inbred rednecks in the modern West Country. Lurie felt this flopped in the States because of its locale, so, says his producer, helpfully added a “familiar setting that was missing from the original”. Welcome then to Blackwater, Mississippi, and yet another tale of small-town Deep South intolerance, familiar from Deliverance to Footloose.
Hoffman’s David is no longer a weedy mathematician but a strapping LA screenwriter played by handsome James Marsden, aiming to finish a script on Stalingrad while actress wife Amy (Kate Bosworth) raises the temperature of old boyfriend Charlie (Alexander Skarsgard) and his gang of ex-school football stars, leering down from the roof they’re repairing. This Straw Dogs can be reduced to a middle-class couple with the builders in, impotently seething as the oiks blast the radio at the crack of dawn, clock out early and traipse indoors to raid the fridge.
Such conflicts are normally resolved before anyone rapes the wife and hangs the cat, and Lurie is good in the long build-up before that happens. Fine acting helps. James Woods (above right) is a one-man wild card as the school team’s ex-coach, playing drunk with a shark-eyed stare, and reservoirs of violent feeling. Skarsgard’s rangy body and direct, almost goofy intelligence convince equally as an abandoned lover in Melancholia and an ageing jock rapist here. The Swedish actor’s version of quiet Southern civility is more intelligent and attractive than David, veiling effective menace. David’s attempts to integrate raise hackles: buying everyone a drink, he doesn’t stay for one himself. “Some people might call that rude,” muses Charlie as the bar-door swings.
When the rape comes, it feels like a film-studies replay of Peckinpah’s awful scene
Class lines are clearly and sympathetically drawn. “Plenty’s what the fuck I need,” mutters a builder when David’s wealth is discussed, in a town where the young black sheriff was in Iraq. Its people are better sketched than the original’s brutish yokels, till the rape scene requires them to be just that. Bosworth, raw-nerved and simply truthful, seems more angered by her effete husband than her violation. When that moment comes, Lurie shows her enjoying Charlie’s aggressive ravishing, as she earlier liked being bossed in bed by David, but it feels like a film-studies replay of Peckinpah’s awful scene, happily avoiding salaciousness, but too squeamishly flinching to affect you or her.
Though Lurie effectively critiques David, his film has its hero’s character. You could imagine David writing it, his buttoned-up Hollywood sensibility sanitising everything. It has the flatly golden look of every other recent Seventies horror remake: The Hills Have Eyes, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, Halloween. Nothing lurks in these frames. Like their heroes, they’re sun-kissed, clean-limbed, innocent. The final confrontation may be meant as David’s private Stalingrad, strategising his survival instead of researching others’. It feels like a choreographed set piece from film-makers with no sense of ferocity. Forty years on, Peckinpah’s film still has a mongrel’s bite. This is a tame pet.
Watch the trailer to Straw Dogs
rating
Share this article
Add comment
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take a subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Comments
I'm not a fan of remakes,