sun 05/05/2024

The Untold Battle of Trafalgar, Channel 4 | reviews, news & interviews

The Untold Battle of Trafalgar, Channel 4

The Untold Battle of Trafalgar, Channel 4

And the story of foreign sailors in Nelson's navy remains untold in a disappointing documentary

If you happen to be in Trafalgar Square in London any time soon, you should take a close look at the friezes that adorn the ground portion of Nelson’s Column. For there you will find, most unexpectedly, that one of the sailors depicted is a black man, one of 1,400 non-British seamen among the 18,000 who took part in the Battle of Trafalgar on 21 October, 1805.

That striking factoid comes from The Untold Battle of Trafalgar, the first in a four-part season, Bloody Foreigners on Channel 4, which aims to show how foreigners were at the heart of some of Britain’s most important historic events. It’s an alluring come-on - who wouldn’t tune in for that? - and this film began by promising to show how the 25 nationalities who were part of Nelson’s fleet that day helped to make Britain the world’s greatest naval power for the next 100 years or so. In actuality, it told a much more intimate story - that of the foreigners onboard one of Nelson’s ships, HMS Bellerophon (Billy Ruffian to her crew).

The film’s documentary evidence was the diary kept by one of Bellerophon’s officers and ships’ documents (now kept at the National Maritime Museum in London), which show some remarkably - and unusually, for the time - detailed information about her crew, including their ethnic origins. Nationalities on board were American, French, Swedish, West Indian, Portuguese and Indian, and the crew included 10 black men, who were, as far as we can tell, treated just the same as anybody else. As Jeremy Hardy’s film was keen to point out, this makes Nelson’s navy the first equal opportunities employer.

Academics made educated guesses about how the non-Britons came to serve in the British Navy - variously they were press-ganged, were escaped slaves, had fled the French Revolution or were offered freedom from prisoner-of-war status if they joined up - and Hardy used dramatic re-enactments to show their roles onboard on that fateful day in 1805 when HMS Bellerophon, as part of the British fleet, faced the combined might of the French and Spanish navies.

But it was unlikely that few, if any, of the sailors involved, whether British or foreign, were there entirely out of a sense of duty to king and country. Rather they were probably thinking of retiring immediately after the battle because the British government had introduced the country’s first bonus scheme - the “prize” money the sailors of all ranks would earn when they brought into port a taken French or Spanish ship. Even for the lowliest sailor it would amount to a small fortune.

Sadly for those on board HMS Bellerophon, then, the ravaging storms that immediately followed the Battle of Trafalgar meant that the prize was much reduced because only four of the 19 taken ships reached the British home port of Gibraltar. The amounts settled on the ordinary seamen were so paltry that after a public outcry the government was forced to increase the payments, but they were still pittances in most cases.

But however fascinating the story of those aboard the Bellerophon that day when England expected every man to do his duty, this film didn’t fulfil its opening promise to tell the much bigger story of foreigners’ contribution to one of the most audacious naval victories in history. This film had the hallmark of something being made to fit into a themed series, however loosely it fitted the criteria, and I felt rather cheated. I hope the films that follow deliver more.
  • Bloody Foreigners continues on Channel 4 nightly until Thursday

Share this article

Comments

Found the programme lacked balance " Foreigners" did not include the largest group which were the Irish Using term "British" does not include Irish Ireland was occupied country just like Jamaica and India it was not British Irish were not even mentioned which is why I say not a balanced picture left me understanding that on the ship in the programme were 26" foreigners" and the rest were English Using average below more than 100 sailors on Bellephoron ship likely to have been Irish See evidence for my comments below (does not include the many who signed on or were press ganged in England) But while Nelson was indeed English, according to the Ayshford Trafalgar Roll, just over half the able seamen at Trafalgar were English (53 per cent) followed by the Irish (21 per cent).

I enjoyed the programme and would like to use aspects of it in a talk I have to give later this yrar. However I failed to take note of some of the the sources they quoted in the making of this programme. One I noted was "Nelsons Navy" but I failed to note the author - I think his surname began with an L If anyone has any info on any of the sources, plus producer etc I would be very grateful to hear from you. Many thanks, Alan Grose

who was the swede on bellerophon former white slave trafalgar battler jumped ship in brazil what a story

Agree entirely with Mr McFadden's comment. The lack of balance in the documentary was incredible, a missed opportunity to tell the untold story of the Battle of Trafalgar. A large chunk of heroic Irish history has been ignored or rewritten to advance a crumbling British imperial ideal. And there is no excuse for this.

Add comment

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters