mon 22/07/2024

Sherlock, Series 3, BBC One | reviews, news & interviews

Sherlock, Series 3, BBC One

Sherlock, Series 3, BBC One

All present and correct - fiendish cleverness, conspiracy theories and sparkling wordplay

Back to Baker Street: Martin Freeman as Dr Watson (left), with Benedict Cumberbatch as the indestructible Holmes

In our big-bang globalised environment, Sherlock Holmes is now more like a Marvel Comics superhero than a mere "consulting detective".

We take it for granted that his deductive powers can peel open the physical and psychological secrets of a complete stranger within milliseconds, while the scope of his ambitions has advanced from solving quaint Edwardian mysteries to unpicking global conspiracies and phantasmagorical terror threats. The game is afoot, but now it's in fibre optic HD 3D with 7.1 surround sound and added social networking.

Happily, Mark Gatiss (who wrote this series three opener) is canny enough to recognise the value of wit to humanise the cascading cleverness, and even amid the quicksilver torrent of tricks and feints he made sure that the Holmes-Watson relationship continued to strike sparks. Much - possibly a little too  much - time was allotted to Watson's coming to terms with Holmes's return from the apparent dead (he was particularly miffed that the select handful of people in on the secret hadn't included him), but the chippy, bantering rapport between Benedict Cumberbatch's mercurial Sherlock and Martin Freeman's stolid Doc is among the best in the long history of their screen incarnations. Clever-clogs Sherlock getting a head-butt and a bloody nose from his exasperated assistant seemed only reasonable.

Mark Gatis as Mycroft Holmes Gatiss (pictured as Mycroft Holmes) had evidently burned wallet-piercing quantities of midnight oil over the feverishly-debated issue of how Sherlock had survived the long drop off the roof of Barts hospital onto the unforgiving pavement below at the end of the last series. Cunningly, he gave himself extra wiggle room by supplying the solution in binary form. First there was a kind of touristic version, involving rubber masks, bungee-jumping and a guest appearance by Derren Brown. We saw this one being relayed to DI Lestrade (an endearingly dog-eared Rupert Graves) by conspiracy nerd and Holmes swot Phillip Anderson (Jonathan Aris, in need of a good bath). Lestrade's reaction - "Bollocks!" - will have struck a popular chord, I think.

Reminder: what happened in the finale to Sherlock series two

Sherlock Holmes on theartsdesk

Version two came from Sherlock himself, and was delivered to a salivating Anderson with smirking triumphalism by the too-clever 'tec. I shan't bore you with the details - you can look 'em up on iPlayer - but Sherlock couldn't conceal his displeasure when Anderson declared himself "disappointed" with the explanation. "Hmmph, everyone's a critic," grunted Holmes. So there we had it - two explanations, each of them nearly as trustworthy as a politician's election promise.

Amanda Abbington in SherlockIt was excellent sport of course, though all this restitching of the narrative fabric - we also had the reintroduction of Una Stubbs as landlady Mrs Hudson and the arrival of Amanda Abbington (pictured left) as Watson's fiancée, Mary - meant that the episode (albeit lasting 90 minutes) had to get its skates on to fit in a bit of new plot. This involved Sherlock being captured and horridly tortured in some Balkan hellhole, then, thanks to an intervention by his super-competitive brother Mycroft (Gatiss himself), whisked back to London to foil a fiendish plot by an "underground network".  Since we're in the wordplay business here, underground turned out to mean Underground, featuring an explosive-crammed tube carriage designed to pick up where Guy Fawkes got off.

The closing seconds offered an oblique glimpse of new villain Charles Augustus Magnussen, played by familiar Danish actor Lars Mikkelsen (Katrine's new boyfriend in the last Borgen). All, or at least a bit more, will be revealed over the next couple of Sundays.

We had two explanations, each nearly as trustworthy as a politician's election promise


Editor Rating: 
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article


There was too much pressure on the first issue to explain the death of Sherlock and his return so that in a way it had too much to do and not enough time to develop the new villain although he is there. A victim of its own success. Fortunately, there will be four episodes so this first one can be treated as a good-natured romp before the shooting starts. The new villain has already shown his wolfeish nature by starting with a bonfire of vanities.

is this programme aimed at adults or children? If it's for the latter the relentless telegraphing and thumping repetition of every last 'laugh' and 'emotion' may just about make sense. As an adult I found the wedding party episode utterly excruciating. It just went on and on. So they love each other: do we need this relentlessly reinforced with Martin Freeman's endless self-deprecating hobbit grins? I gave up, came back in the room 20 minutes later and Sherlock's speech was still going on. I fled. Never again.

Add comment

Subscribe to

Thank you for continuing to read our work on For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a gift subscription?


Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters