thu 22/08/2019

Berlioz Requiem, Spyres, Philharmonia Orchestra, Nelson, St Paul's Cathedral review - masses and voids | reviews, news & interviews

Berlioz Requiem, Spyres, Philharmonia Orchestra, Nelson, St Paul's Cathedral review - masses and voids

Berlioz Requiem, Spyres, Philharmonia Orchestra, Nelson, St Paul's Cathedral review - masses and voids

Shock and awe on the 150th anniversary of the composer's death

Nelson, the Philharmonia Orchestra and Chorus and the London Philharmonic Choir in rehearsalBoth rehearsal images by Martin Kendrick

Asked to choose five or ten minutes of favourite Berlioz on the 150th anniversary of his death (yesterday), surely few would select anything from his giant Requiem (Grande Messe des Morts). This is a work to shock and awe, not to be loved - music for a state funeral given a metaphysical dimension by the composer's hallmark extremes in original scoring. It cries out for an ecclesiastical edifice to resonate with the masses and provide the voids, but St Paul's Cathedral has always been one step too far: glorious to be in, not the place for a true musical experience. All things considered, John Nelson, the Philharmonia Orchestra and Chorus and the London Philharmonic Choir managed it as well as they possibly could

It depends on where you sit, but even in the very front row of the seating under the dome, what in continental terms would be seen as a VIP seat but made available because the three unreserved press rows were already full, I can't claim to have had the ideal experience. Illuminating, certainly, to hear how Berlioz writes for cellos and especially double basses; but the massed choirs, though they still made such a splendid noise, especially in full throttle unisons, that one wondered if a few professionals had been lodged within them, sounded a good deal further away than they actually were.Rehearsal for the Berlioz Requiem in St Paul's CathedralIt certainly wasn't the fault of them or their chorus masters, Gavin Carr and Neville Creed - Nelson is also a renowned chorus trainer - if hardly any consonants emerged. Worst casualty, from my perspective, was the judgment-day juggernaut of the Lacrimosa, all string ricochets and roars, but very little of the vital melodic line coming through.

The foundations duly shook with the soundings of the four brass bands, placed at the pillars to the two transepts; judgment day indeed. What worked best were the moments of dynamic or orchestral restraint: unearthly chords of wind and brass, above all the heaven of the flutes above the hell of the trombones, the chromatic descents of the Kyrie fading to black, string elaborations around the ghostly choral keenings on Berlioz's favourite interval (minor sixth to fifth). Michael SpyresNelson couldn't hope to interpret much under these circumstances, and maybe Berlioz's approach to the mass doesn't allow that; a firm beat and proper cues from a manager of huge forces were required, and duly provided.  Acoustically and emotionally the high spot of the evening - and how high it is for the tenor - was the angelic trumpeting of Michael Spyres (pictured above by Marco Borrelli) in the Sanctus; singing like this would make it one slice of Berlioz to take to one's desert island, after all, if it weren't for the relatively earthbound choral "Hosannas"s.

It's not in any way Spyres's fault if he got a longer programme biography than the note for the music; Latin/English texts most of us could do without, but unforgivable not to list the players and choral members. This, of all solemn events, was not the right place for a glossy, flimsy souvenir brochure. Hoping for better this summer from the BBC Proms, which must surely be giving us the Mass in the place where it works best, the Royal Albert Hall. No idea what the overall programme is yet - details in April - but the biggest and most original, if not the very best, of Berlioz has to be among the anniversary tributes.

Comments

A mealy mouthed assessment, I prefer the response the audience gave to the performers. Sorry about not being able to sit in the Press seats and having to seat in the front three rows, bad lick.

The point was to qualify my experience of the performance, given the notorious acoustical problems of St Paul's. Don't think I didn't give a generous response to the performers. I do think part of the ovation was to celebrate the nature of the occasion, though.

Do so agree about the tatty programme! Not even the movements given - nor even a mention of Colin Davis's magnificent performances in the 1960s. I was looking out for you but did not spot you! As a follow up to a magnificent Harold in Italy from Sinfonia of Birmingham in Pershore Abbey on Saturday this has been a great week for this Berlioz lover!

Thank you Mr Nice for your review of Berlioz requiem in St Paul's. Personally, I was sitting in the south transept and I found it an awful listening experience. At some stages I had to protect my ears as the sound was simlply deafening.

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters