mon 27/05/2019

Chuck Close Prints: Process and Collaboration, White Cube Bermondsey | reviews, news & interviews

Chuck Close Prints: Process and Collaboration, White Cube Bermondsey

Chuck Close Prints: Process and Collaboration, White Cube Bermondsey

Close clearly relishes unveiling the method behind the illusion, the trickery behind the magic

Lou, 2012 jacquard tapestry© Chuck Close Courtesy Pace Gallery and White Cube

Chuck Close is often described as a photorealist. It’s a fair description. His paintings often look like photographs, and he came to prominence in the late Sixties, when photorealism was the rage. At first his huge heads were scaled-up painted transcriptions of black and white photos, such as Big Self-Portrait, 1968, which is the painting you’ll find in most art history accounts of the period. It captures a kind of rough diamond Easy Rider persona. Then he turned to colour and painted his huge heads as if they were seen through the distorting prism of a bathroom window. Or for those with a mind to the digital age, as if low-grade pixelated screen shots.

For those who are fair-to-middling, or simply a bit nothing, in their opinion of Close, they will, I believe, be deeply impressed by this travelling survey of Close’s prints (it’s been touring America for the past decade). Featuring some 150 works, the exhibition documents just how involved, complex and labour-intensive many of his processes are and just how much manipulation an image undergoes at various stages of its making. And as the title suggests, it’s a collaborative process. Close works with a team of master printmakers and it’s a real eye-opener to be introduced to the range of techniques, some very old, some relatively new and experimental, and some arrived at simply by chance and accident, that he has explored throughout his career.

Chuck Close, Self-Portrait, 2011This museum quality show takes us from the velvety mezzotints of Keith, his earliest foray into print-making, to the startlingly photo-like tapestries featuring Lou Reed (main picture) and Roy Lichtenstein. Etchings, engravings, Japanese wood-block prints, grey-scale paper pulp editions, silkscreens, and bulkily built-up collages – each process is ceaselessly explored for its range of possibilities. Often the same image will undergo the same process again and again, varying in tone, depth, texture. Like his gridded lozenge paintings, individual cellular units coalesce to form the image as you move further away, taking us from abstraction to representation. Close clearly relishes unveiling the method behind the illusion, the trickery behind the magic, if you will, and so do we (pictured above right, Self-Portrait / Felt Hand Stamp, 2011)

His exploration of the face, his own and that of his friends, is almost brutal in its hunger to interrogate every line and sag amid the pitted surface. And he gets pitilessly close to his subject. Squared off and isolated, nothing detracts from the face. Reed looks like some menacing lizard man, Philip Glass, another good friend, looks as if he’s sizing us up in return. Mouth slightly open, eyes heavy-lidded, Glass’s scaled-up visage looks down at us as we look up, feeling a little small in comparison. It’s a face that appears kinder the craggier it’s got, whereas Reed just looks perennially scary.

Unlike Warhol’s Superstars, in which the concentration of the lens for minutes at a time strips the subject of its mask, in Close’s work we interrogate the mask presented in a snapshot that took a second to take. But the snapshot remade reveals its own fascinations. The face becomes vast, virgin territory and we its explorers. Don’t miss this show.

Follow Fisun Guner on Twitter

The exhibition documents just how much manipulation an image undergoes at various stages of its making

Share this article

Comments

Great review! One note -- the image of Close in a yellow jacket is NOT Self Portrait / Felt Hand Stamp, 2011, as labeled. It is Self Portrait (Yellow Raincoat), 2013, an editioned print on paper published by Magnolia Editions.

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters