tue 16/07/2024

Nora: A Doll's House, Young Vic review - Ibsen diced, sliced and reinvented with poetic precision | reviews, news & interviews

Nora: A Doll's House, Young Vic review - Ibsen diced, sliced and reinvented with poetic precision

Nora: A Doll's House, Young Vic review - Ibsen diced, sliced and reinvented with poetic precision

Stef Smith brings exhilarating spirit to a familiar classic

Luke Norris as Thomas with Natalie Klamar, Anna Russell-Martin and Amaka Okafor as the three NorasImages - Marc Brenner

Ibsen's Nora slammed the door on her infantilising marriage in 1879 but the sound of it has continued to reverberate down the years.

In 2013, Carrie Cracknell directed Hattie Morahan in an award-winning performance at this theatre, last year Tanika Gupta profitably wove her story into that of colonial India at the Lyric, Hammersmith, Robert Icke's Children of Nora is due to open in Amsterdam in April and Samuel Adamson's exploration of relationships in four distinct periods, Wife, at the Kiln last summer, echoed Nora's experience. Jamie Lloyd is scheduled to bring his original touch to Frank McGuinness' adaptation, with Jessica Chastain as Nora, at the Playhouse in June, but first here is Stef Smith's response, arrived in London after its showing at the Tramway in Glasgow a year ago. Nora's first shocking exit left plenty to be discussed on the subjects of marriage and feminism and Smith joins in the debate with relish.

Mark Arends in Nora: A Doll's HouseTranslation can spell liberation. Where Victorian English might be distancing, a new version of a play originally written in another language immediately benefits from the immediacy of familiar speech. Stef Smith began as a poet and her enjoyment of language in different registers, with a hint at period changes, is one of the pleasures of this piece. Here there are three Noras at three stages of liberation: 1918 when (some) women earned the right to vote; 1968 just after the legalisation of abortion and when the contraceptive pill was coming into general use; and 2018 as the #MeToo movement gathered momentum.

Smith has not so much adapted Ibsen as exploded the original while adding a pacey intensity. Some names are changed, but the bones of the story are here: Nora's apparently perfect marriage and family life are threatened by the impending revelation by a blackmailer of her fraudulent acquisition of money to aid her husband's recovery from a breakdown. Christine, an old friend of Nora's and a previous lover of the would-be blackmailer, an employee of Nora's husband, intervenes, but in the end all is revealed and Thomas (Ibsen's Torvald) shows himself to be weak and unworthy of his wife's love. She walks out on the marriage.

Amaka Okafor in Nora: A Doll's HouseSmith's three Noras are sometimes interchangeable, sometimes very much of their time. They occasionally speak in chorus or use the third person to describe their/her predicament, but they are also differentiated, by both class and demeanour. Anna Russell-Martin is a tough, hard-talking contemporary Scot, Natalie Klamar is an Estuary Sixties woman hesitantly discovering new sexual possibilities, while Amaka Okafor (pictured right) has an elegant, middle-class dignity as the 1918 Nora. Each has a secret means of escape from the day-to-day: sugar for the earliest Nora; pills, "mother's little helpers", in the Sixties, and alcohol in 2018. Luke Norris, Thomas in every case, slips into altered speech and posture as necessary. All three Noras also play three Christines. The whole thing – a tense hour and 45 minutes – is beautifully controlled and choreographed in Elizabeth Freestone's sympathetic direction. Tom Piper's abstract set – three lit doorways with the suggestion of an icy river beyond – with audience on three sides of a thrust stage, and Michael John McCarthy's moody soundscape, often suggestive of heartbeats, complete Nora's world.

Although there is a distinct feminist call to arms here, there is also an acknowledgement that things have changed in 100 years. Women can vote, they can work, have loving relationships with each other without embarrassment and choose whether to have children, but without financial independence choice is still limited. And this is not restricted to women: Nathan (Ibsen's Krogstad: played by Mark Arends, pictured above left) is just as desperate to do the best for his family in pinched circumstances, just as prone to break society's rules to do so as Nora. Choice, the freedom to choose, is a theme that runs through the play. It is notable that Smith's Nora – in all her manifestations – seems unsure whether her children are a barrier to her self-realisation, that she wishes them gone because she lacks the confidence to be a good enough mother or she simply adores them. Or perhaps all three. Freedom is a desirable ambition, but achieving it is complicated. The play ends with a half-completed sentence on the idea.


Smith has not so much adapted Ibsen as exploded the original while adding a pacey intensity


Editor Rating: 
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 15,000 pieces, we're asking for £5 per month or £40 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take a subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?


Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters