mon 26/08/2019

Go Bang Your Tambourine, Finborough Theatre review - out-dated and long-winded | reviews, news & interviews

Go Bang Your Tambourine, Finborough Theatre review - out-dated and long-winded

Go Bang Your Tambourine, Finborough Theatre review - out-dated and long-winded

Rare Philip King play turns a farce into a serious drama - and it doesn't work

Blow, baby, blow: Mia Austen and Sebastian Calver in 'Go Bang Your Tambourine'.Phil Gammon

Theatre legends die hard. Playwright Philip King, who passed away in 1979, was once hailed as the monarch of the farceurs, and his best-know play, See How They Run (1944), features the immortal line: "Sergeant, arrest most of these vicars!". Like so many legendary lines, this one is not in original text, which actually says: "Sergeant, arrest most of these people!" But never mind, the remarkable thing about his 1970 drama, Go Bang Your Tambourine, is that it has never been seen in London, until now that is, thanks to the advocacy of Two's Company and this fringe venue.

The play's title does take some forgiving, but its ingredients are familiar: set in a Lancashire two-up, two-down house, this is a family drama. Nineteen-year-old David Armstrong - a member of the Sally Army who is training to be a cornet player - lives alone, having just lost his mother. He is a naïve soul, and lonely. When he advertises for a lodger, he is pleased that Bess, an older local barmaid, decides to move in. So far, so odd couple: he is very repressed and she is ebullient. But what will Major Webber, the female head of the god squad, think of this domestic arrangement?

This mix of innocence and experience - which gets a shot of emotional intensity when Tom, David's long-estranged father pays an unexpected visit and is visibly attracted to Bess - is great material for an uproarious farce. You can imagine unexpected entrances, dropped trousers and a young woman in a negligee. What misunderstandings there could be; what larks; what laughs. What a potential avalanche of double meanings. But no such luck. This time, King decided to subvert his reputation, and to treat this situation seriously - and, sadly, this was not a good idea.

For a start, all of the characters are based on stereotypes: David is the nerdish mummy's boy, Bess is the tart with a heart, the Major the prudish spinster and Tom the Lothario. Great for a farce, not so good for a serious play. And King's clumsy attempts to deepen his characters by giving them shades of complexity don't really work. To be fair, King does show how both Bess and the Major act as mother substitutes to the bereaved David, and the introduction of Tom as his son's rival for Bess's affections does give the play a hint of oedipal tension. In fact, the best scenes are the initial exchanges between David and Bes, which are excruciatingly awkward, and the later conflict between father and son, when their mutual hatred is clearly articulated.

The competition between the two men, the one sexually experienced and the other a virgin, for the single woman is brutal and intense. However, there is something not a little disturbing in King's portrait of the openly sexist Tom, while his depiction of Bess, who can't seem to decide whether to be good or not, and who is attracted to Tom despite her correct perception that he's a male chauvinist pig, is definitely dated. The piece's sexual politics manage to be of the 1970s, without being critical of the times. If anything, they feel reactionary. Maybe King should have asked for advice from some women.

The Two's Company team, director Tricia Thorns and designer Alex Marker, whose meticulous set is a quiet joy, do their best with unpromising material. The production's strong point is its casting: Sebastian Calver and Mia Austen make a nice contrast as the gawky David and the feisty Yorkshirewoman Bess, while John Sackville (pictured above with Austen) is great as the slimy and creepy Tom. Patience Tomlinson's Major is pitch-perfect. However, the decision to have two intervals, and the several episodes when the energy sags, make this a long-winded evening of almost three hours. Since King has little to say that is interesting about religion, sex or friendship, that is simply too much. If only there had been some hectic tambourine banging!

The piece's sexual politics manage to be of the 1970s, without being critical

rating

Editor Rating: 
2
Average: 2 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters