thu 31/07/2014

Strictly Gershwin, English National Ballet, Royal Albert Hall | Dance reviews, news & interviews

Strictly Gershwin, English National Ballet, Royal Albert Hall

If you like formation dancing, you'll love this. Otherwise not so much

ENB's 'Strictly Gershwin': 'A woefully misconceived evening'Photo: Patrick Baldwin

Mark Twain once wrote of his experience of going to German opera. It starts at 6, he said, and they sing for four hours. Then you look at your watch, and it’s 6.15. This is also an all-too-accurate description of a night at English National Ballet’s Strictly Gershwin. Except that I began to look at my watch after 10 minutes.

Old-fashioned ballroom sequins have Derek Deane fatally in thrall

I can’t remember ever enjoying any theatrical experience less. The Albert Hall is not in any case a place for dance – dance in the round is a contradiction in terms, it simply means everyone has a bad seat. But at Strictly Gershwin I swiftly realised not being able to see was no bad thing. Derek Deane is not so much a choreographer (see his Swan Lake in the round if you don’t believe me) as a marshaller. He pushes groups here, he pushes them there, and everyone valiantly pretends it’s dancing. But his steps are risible, there is no aesthetic motivation at all – old-fashioned ballroom sequins seem to have him fatally in thrall.

Gershwin_RAH_single_fig_Ph_Patrick_BaldwinOne feels for the very talented dancers wading through this treacle (Kerry Birkett, pictured right in "Lady Be Good", photo: Patrick Baldwin). Tamara Rojo, brought in as the guest star, could do nothing with either of her big turns, “Rhapsody in Blue” (corps de ballet in "Rhapsody", pictured below, photo: Michael Gardner), when her first entry is so covered in dry ice that she is invisible from her waist down, or “An American in Paris”, which recreates all the cheesy bits of the 1950s view of France, while omitting the film’s very considerable charm. Daria Klimentová managed better in “Summertime”, merely by virtue of it being a pas de deux, and thus not cluttered with all the props and toys and costumes and folderol for which Deane appears to nurture an unnatural passion.

The rationale for the whole evening is also distinctly under-thought. The first half is called “Gershwin on Broadway”, the second “Gershwin in Hollywood”. And then giant stills of such well-known song-and-dance folk as Paul Henried, Bogart, Bacall, Cary Grant and Ingrid Bergman are flashed up during the “Broadway” section. What have they to do with Broadway? Or even Gershwin?

Gershwin_RAH_ph_Michael_GarnerThere are images, as well, of Astaire and Rogers – there is even a clip of them dancing in slow motion, a tiny moment so vivid, so pure, that it makes it entirely impossible to watch the dancers beneath tromping through their drum-majorette formations.

The musical interludes were rather a relief, even if the orchestrations took Gershwin’s acid bite and blanded it out before amping up the sound to blur away the detail. But this is, altogether, a woefully misconceived evening.

 

Comments

Hello I was at the opening night performance last night and enjoyed the show very much. In my opinion, anyone who fails to appreciate the hard work, skill, passion, verve and brilliance of English National Ballet (dancers and orchestra), Maria Friedman (a stellar performance of many vocal shades) and the guest tappers, ballroom and featured artists - is a cold and joyless individual with no passion for life. This show is uplifting, fun and with something to appeal to all lovers of music and dance. By the audience reaction I'd say the other 4998 members of the audience agreed with me.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 7,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters