fri 25/07/2014

En Atendant, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker’s Rosas, Sadler’s Wells | Dance reviews, news & interviews

En Atendant, Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker’s Rosas, Sadler’s Wells

The Belgian choreographer goes back to the Middle Ages. And finds modernity

Rosas in action: 'a sort of proto-Renaissance exploration of the golden ratio' All photos Anne van Aarschot

No one ever accused of Anne Teresa De Keersmaeker of thinking small. Or not thinking, for that matter. Her international career began with a bang, when with only her second work she created Fase, Four Movements to the Music of Steve Reich. And Reich’s music, filled with repetitive figures, harmonic rhythm and canons, is not a million miles – even if it’s 600 years – away from the ars subtilior of Avignon, De Keersmaeker’s new musical focus.

A type of 14th-century polyphony, the songs of this mannerist style are highly complex technically: difficult to perform, they are more like 20th-century avant-garde music than anything that falls between now and then. Their attraction to De Keersmaeker, in other words, must have been instantaneous. She too has always focused on highly complex pieces, on patterns, on shapes, on mathematical workings-out of a musical style.

En Atendant was originally staged in Avignon, on the medieval walls at dusk. Here the stripped back flats of Sadler’s Wells have to stand in, and some atmosphere is obviously lost. Yet when flautist Michael Schmid appears, to create a range of sounds that no modern flute was ever designed to make, the archaism of the sound world is established immediately. As always with De Keersmaeker, it goes on for longer than seems entirely sane, and yet, also as always, you come out the other side feeling altered, stripped back.

Then eight dancers appear, five men and three women. Based entirely on a walking step, they pace out what swiftly becomes clear is the score: one note, one step. This is intermittently entwined by three musical performers, the wonderfully lush soprano of Annelies Van Gramberen, Thomas Baeté on viol and Bart Coen on recorder.

Gradually it is possible to distinguish the different musical “voices” among the dancers – two men perform a stamping quick-step, while a third marks time more slowly, as though he’s the continuo.

De Keersmaeker is not content to leave it there, however, and a further theoretical layer is added as she divides each dancer in two – the lower body dancing, the upper body shaping out a series of mathematical points on a grid, a sort of proto-Renaissance exploration of the golden ratio.

I’m not really sure that this layer adds anything, and in some ways it is a distraction. When the music is absent, the works can fail to cohere, producing work that is intelligent, and interesting, but not felt.

The second part of De Keersmaeker’s engagement with ars subtilior is her Cesena, which will be performed later in the week; it is only then, I suspect, that the overall pattern will emerge.

Watch En Atendant from the Festival d'Avignon

 

Comments

I love the fact that Anne

I love the fact that Anne Teresa de Keersmaeker keeps evolving. And i do believe her work to be more and more interesting. i love her love ot working on dance, and not reproducing or saying satisfied with her past work (as great as it may be). En atendant is for me a come back to the importance of music. It has a certain classical formalism. It is splendid. Long live to ATK!

In over 40 years of watching

In over 40 years of watching contemporary dance, I have never witnessed such a pretentiously boring production. Little wonder the audience at Sadlers Wells were restless, heckling and walking out. I am surprised that De KeersMaeker who is a talented choreographer thought she could hold an audience with en attendant.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 7,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters