Founder rate ends 9th September.

We’re rebuilding theartsdesk to secure the future of real arts journalism. Be part of it by subscribing: if you do it now, the founders’ rate of just £40 yearly is yours FOR LIFE!

SUBSCRIBE NOW 

Every Good Boy Deserves Favour, National Theatre

Can Stoppard and Previn tell us anything about contemporary Russia?

share this article

Tormented by music: Julian Bleach in 'Every Good Boy Deserves Favour'
Simon Annad

Over the last 20 years or so, the genre of music we have learnt to associate with the violent assault of a regime upon its adversaries is hard rock blared out on massive speakers at ear-splitting volume, 24/7. First tried out with decisive results by the American military on General "Pineapple Face" Noriega of Panama in 1989, it has been refined in recent times to break down the resistance of innumerable presumed jihadis and insurgents in US detention.

The juxtaposition between those two dynamic elements contrived by Tom Stoppard and André Previn in 1977 with Every Good Boy Deserves Favour was something much more subtle and much more recondite, both in musical and dramatic terms: a full-sized orchestra sharing the stage with actors, not being drummed into the skulls of the detainees so much as emanating from the deranged brain of one of them.

The perfectly sane political dissident Alexander Ivanov (Adrian Schiller) has been imprisoned for his public denunciation of the Brezhnev-era policy of incarcerating political dissidents (a neatly illogical circle of the sort Stoppard favours). He is thrown into a cell in a KGB-run mental hospital with a schizophrenic (also named Ivanov, played by Julian Bleach) who is tormented by the music he hears in his mind, pretty much 24/7.

In a brutal corollary of the famed formula first expounded by Sartre in his 1944 play Huis Clos, Alexander soon discovers that hell is not just other people, but above all a deranged and frequently aggressive cellmate who won’t stop banging on his triangle (worn around his neck like a chain of office) or banging on about the finer points of the performances of the orchestra that he –  but not Alexander - can hear at all times, and which we, the audience, both hear and see, for most of the 65 minutes of the play.

But there is a considerable degree of cognitive dissonance between what we can see and hear, and what Ivanov hears, and Alexander hears about from his cellmate. The presence on stage of the Southbank Sinfonia, conducted with spirit and aplomb by Simon Over, is an unalloyed pleasure for the audience, as the orchestra glides and weaves its way through the score composed by Previn. His is a masterful pastiche of the Soviet/nationalist symphonic canon of the time: whole strands of Shostakovich and Prokofiev, snatches of Berg.

Likewise, the almost relentlessly sophisticated calembours and jeux d’esprit, riffing on both musical and geometrical themes (the mad Ivanov’s triangle segues into the brisk maths lessons given by the unsympathetic Soviet school teacher to Alexander’s hapless young son Sasha), are vintage Stoppard of a very high order.

To contemporary ears they do seem widely removed from the urgency and the horrors of Soviet oppression of dissidents. Alexander's setpiece speech, delivered with great conviction by Schiller, is a faithful re-elaboration by Stoppard of a long sequence of arrests and detention of actual Soviet dissidents. At the height of the Cold War it would have carried a strong resonance. As the direct memories of the Soviet regime fade from our collective consciousness, it struggles to have the same sense of compelling immediacy.

The author calls our attention in his programme notes to the return of the worst aspects of state persecution of independent journalists and commentators in Putin’s Russia – 50 journalists murdered since the fall of Communism, in his estimation – and we are obviously reminded by more recent examples of state-sponsored brutality of detainees. But does the play still work on its own terms?

It certainly helps that there is a constant stream of visual stimuli to draw on, thanks to masterful direction from Felix Barrett and Tom Morris, superb staging from designer Bob Crowley and lighting designer Bruno Poet, not forgetting a violent and comic ballet sequence choreographed by Maxine Doyle. And without revealing the revised play’s secrets - back here for a limited run after last year's revival - the final cataclysm brilliantly evokes the breakdown of the Communist system, opening up a pathway to a vague and distant “elsewhere”. Not without hope, after all.

rating

0

share this article

Help secure the future of arts journalism

In this era of algorithmic recommendation, opaquely sponsored content and AI slop, theartsdesk’s mission to preserve real journalistic and critical values has never been more important.

If you like what you see here, please join us 
in this mission.

Subscribing to the site will help us in our coming 
redesign and expansion.


If you do this before the 9th September this will be at our guaranteed founder’s rate: 
your subs will never increase again.

Subscribe now for £5 per month. 
or yearly for just £40.

Or if you simply want to support us with a one-off donation, you can do so here.

more theatre

Emily White’s new play is important, but too often tells where it could show
New play about love and loneliness in London has terrific gender and genre fluidity
Not everything works but, with this unbreakable musical, it doesn't need to
Simon Stone's latest reversioning of a classic is a muddled misfire
Lots of innovative ideas, but we need to hear the line readings clearly
Eurovision star Sam Ryder is made for the title role, while Drew McOnie’s choreography makes us feel the delirium
Chloë Moss’s new drama is a nerve-fraying example of telephonic tension
Carrie Cracknell’s splendid revival of Stoppard’s masterwork transfers with its magic intact
Transatlantic tensions are diffused through alcohol, sex, and the etiquette of hot dogs