fri 25/07/2014

CD: Everything Everything – Arc | New music reviews, news & interviews

CD: Everything Everything – Arc

Fidgety, exasperating second album from 2011 Mercury nominees

Everything Everything's 'Arc': unfocused

Up to this point it’s all gone swimmingly for Manchester-based quartet Everything Everything. Their debut album Man Alive charted high in the summer of 2010, but follow-up Arc is the test of whether they’re in for the long haul. Although the answer is largely in the hands of their strong fan base, the unfocused Arc suggests the band themselves aren’t sure of who they are.

It’s difficult to stand still while paddling furiously, but that’s what Arc sounds like – a band with a million-and-one ideas and no overriding sense of unity. Not only does it fail to take them beyond Man Alive, it dilutes what they were about.

Much feels familiar: Jonathan Higgs’ voice, like Peter Gabriel-meets-Thom Yorke; the ubiquitous post-Vampire Weekend west African touches; the twitchy, scratchy percussion and stabby keyboards of mid-Eighties crossover dance-pop. Opening cut “Cough Cough", issued as single last year, is the entry point. A bets-hedging almost-anthem, it suggests Everything Everything have stadia in their sights. Which would be fine if that was all they had on their minds; it might allow Arc to create a mood and reel in listeners. Instead, nothing is allowed to stay in one place for long, let alone outstay its welcome. Impressions flit past: “Duet”'s odd bits of Snow Patrol; “Feet For Hands” borrowing Muse’s drama; “Armourland”'s echo of Howard Jones.

By singing at the limit of his range, Higgs presumably intends to convey drama and emotion, but over a whole album the formula wears thin. The yearning “The House is Dust” is, however, allowed to follow its nose and consequently lingers. Decoupled from the album, individual tracks might make sense live - but as a whole Arc has no, well, arc.

Visit Kieron Tyler’s blog

Watch a suitably fragmented promo for Everything Everything’s Arc

 

Comments

Good to see people employing

Good to see people employing the 'I disagree with this review, so I just say it's a rubbish review' approach. Very sensible!

I never said the review was

I never said the review was right (I haven't heard the album) it's just the comments seem to basically slate the reviewer for not liking the album. It's not like they were looking down their nose at the band or anything.

This review is a heap of

This review is a heap of rubbish - first two songs of the album are the best songs of the last 12 months, sure the rest of the cd will keep up the same standard.

Totally agree. What an

Totally agree. What an utterly clueless review. "mid-Eighties crossover dance-pop''? Howard Jones? WTF?! I've heard the album in full and I think it will be one of the best albums of this year. It's a great leap forward from their debut, which I think confused a few people (although I loved it). The band have matured and honed their craft way beyond what I was expecting to hear. 'Duet', 'Armourland', Radiant' and 'The Peaks' are the best songs they've recorded so far.

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 7,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters