10 Questions for Joss Whedon | Film reviews, news & interviews
10 Questions for Joss Whedon
The cult writer-director reflects on his deft, intimate Shakespearean update
Few heroes of cult genre television ever manage the transition into mainstream financial success – although JJ Abrams hasn't been doing too badly for himself – and for many years Joss Whedon's deified status among fans of his various lovingly crafted, emotionally rich series was not reflected by broader recognition.
Buffy the Vampire Slayer, its spin-off series Angel, and space-western Firefly have all maintained a passionately devoted core of fans, despite all having been off the air for almost a decade, and it was largely thanks to fan campaigning that Whedon made his feature directing debut on 2006 sci-fi Serenity. And yet he was still only a household name in a very specific subset of households, and his long-gestating Wonder Woman film project stalled soon after Serenity's debut.
It now looks as though his big-screen curse has been well and truly broken
Then came last year's The Avengers, Whedon's smart and impassioned take on a Marvel ensemble piece that should by rights have been a mess, but which instead opened to universally warm reviews and became the third highest-grossing film of all time.
It says a lot about Whedon that what he chose to do with his fortnight of downtime in between production and post-production on The Avengers was make a micro-budget adaptation of a Shakespearean comedy. It also says a lot that the comedy he chose was Much Ado About Nothing, which contains what may be Shakespeare's most overtly feminist speech.
Whedon created Buffy the Vampire Slayer as a response to the horror trope of the helpless, doomed blonde girl in a dark alley, giving that girl back her power. And while Buffy's seven-year television run came about because the original feature film was taken out of Whedon's hands, it now looks as though his big-screen curse has been well and truly broken, with Much Ado enjoying an unexpectedly strong box office opening in the US this weekend. It stars Whedon regulars Amy Acker (pictured below) and Alexis Denisof as Beatrice and Benedick.
When theartsdesk meets Whedon in London, he's at the tail end of a lengthy day of press and has spent several hours locked, vampiric, in a room without windows. But his enthusiasm for the project, his affection for the characters and his intricate knowledge of the text are untempered.
EMMA DIBDIN: You’ve described Much Ado as the most accessible of Shakespeare’s comedies. What was it about the text that jumped out at you as appealing to a contemporary audience?
JOSS WHEDON: It has the least fantasy of all of the comedies, it has no verse at all, and it is structurally the grandpappy of all romantic comedies. I think even people who never watch Shakespeare, with Beatrice and Benedick they can just fall in, and go "Oh my God, they’re hilarious" and "Oh, she’s… making a feminist credo here, that’s kind of unexpected!" So that was what started me on it, and then I really delved into the text with the idea of, "Well, what if I am going to film this?"
And it was at that point I realised that the whole play is fascinating – it’s not just a two-man show, and then waiting through the wedding scene until the two come back again. It’s all in service of a very textured and weird and cynical and sort of romantic view of love, and our rituals of love, and that to me made it worth doing. I wanted to do it because of Amy and Alexis, but I decided to do it because I thought "Okay, he's got something to say here", and it's all of a piece.
Also, the fact that it all takes place in one setting gave it a visual coherence that, with the incredibly limited amount of time I had, was sort of essential. Leonato’s estate is such an important part of what it is, and knowing exactly how I felt about that space, and how I wanted to film it, made it the perfect thing.
You went straight from principal photography on The Avengers into shooting Much Ado. How much did your approach shift between those two projects?
With Much Ado, I was really in service of the script and the acting, in a way that didn't allow me to get very tricky. And that isn't to say that I didn't have a visual idea of what I wanted, but what I mostly wanted was to get through about eight pages a day, and to capture some of the energy of the live performance. So we never split a scene into two days, for example. Just facilitating that energy alone dictated a lot of choices.
Then, of course, I had one advantage that I never had on The Avengers, which was that I got to spend a lot of time on the set, prepping! So I was really able to use the space in exactly the way that I wanted to. On Avengers, you know, the paint was drying when we got onto the set, or there would be a location that we’d get too late. Whereas here I was able to, and needed to, have a really strong sense of where things would happen, and how the space would be used.
You’re largely faithful to the text, but you add some key moments to expand on relationships, including a flashback to Beatrice and Benedick’s past. What was the thought process behind those additions? (Acker and Denisof pictured)
We decided to open with an earlier time, with Beatrice and Benedick having a one-night stand that we later flash back to, because I wasn't born yesterday - sex sex sex sex sex sex! Yes. But no, Amy and Alexis and I discussed it a lot. Some people interpret the text that way, the "I know you of old" line. But it’s sort of six of one, it doesn’t really affect the main body of the thing. We all just liked that texture, for the way they behave towards each other. We felt it gave their banter an intimacy, and a painful quality that you might not have otherwise.
How about the decision to have Hero watching Claudio grieve over her?
That was a really important addition. A lot of this for me was about finding the strength in Hero; she doesn't talk a great deal, and I think she often gets shunted aside as a completely passive character. But she is the only character who never believes something that is not true. Even though she doesn't fully understand what's happening, I don't think of her as this passive person, and I chose Jillian because she has a quality that I also see in Amy, of being really majestic and put together, in charge of herself. The grieving scene, her watching him grieve, and seeing "oh, he really means it", for me that was empowering, but also necessary.
Because it's always a buy, when Hero and Claudio get together at the end, and I thought the step that will take this to where I can accept it is the idea that she sees him at the tomb, and knows, even though we took out his big speech about it, that he is genuinely upset. He's not as upset as he could have been, because Fran was like "Okay! Are we going again, because I can really bring it this time!" I was like "What part of magic hour do you not understand? Magic hour is 10 minutes long! We got that shot, we're moving on!" But besides the fact that it's probably the most beautiful shot in the movie, I love the fact that she's there, and I love the fact that Beatrice is with her.
Overleaf: "I'm so lazy. There's nothing better than rolling out of bed and going 'Action!'"
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take an annual subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Jesse Eisenberg and Kristen Stewart take on the CIA in a geeky action caper
Rousing Randolph Scott Western with a semblance of truth
Allusive meditation on creativity from banned Iranian director Jafar Panahi
theartsdesk recommends the half-dozen top movies out now
Vivid documentary on resistance to Mexico's drug cartels hits home
Jessica Chastain and Colin Farrell are the mistress and servant messing with each other’s heads in an airless Strindberg adaptation
Carey Mulligan sparkles but Thomas Vinterberg's Hardy is only a partial account
Charlotte Rampling and Tom Courtenay shine in Andrew Haigh's wintry marital drama
Arch reimagining of a gruesome 1976 proto-slasher film of the same name
Finely formed tale of battling the odds from the director of 'The Page Turner'
Uneven TV travelogue from the maverick director
James Franco nears rock bottom in London-set thriller