Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan, National Gallery | Visual arts reviews, news & interviews
Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan, National Gallery
An unmissable exhibition bringing together nine of the artist's 15 surviving works
Leonardo da Vinci was not a prolific artist. In a career that lasted nearly half a century, he probably painted no more than 20 pictures, and only 15 surviving paintings are currently agreed to be entirely his. Of these, four are incomplete. Indeed one painting, abandoned by the artist but currently hanging in the National Gallery, is so far from being finished that the two figures in it, that of Saint Jerome and the lion in the wilderness (c 1488-90, Pinacoteca Vaticana, pictured below), have been barely touched by paint.
Yet the aged saint’s musculature, the way the taut sinews of his neck are exposed as he pulls his head to one side and stretches out his right arm, have been delineated and modelled with such intricate care that it seems obvious that this was the part that most interested the artist.
Uncharacteristically, Jerome is shown beardless, whilst the right hand that clutches the rock with which he is about to pummel his chest, is held not, as convention dictates, to his breast, but farthest from it.
The gesture is compositionally dynamic, since the outlines of the saint’s body are echoed by the lion at his feet – both jaws are agape, and the heads of beast and man meet in a diagonal line. Yet the dramatic gesture does something else. The saint’s posture allowed Leonardo to explore pictorially what he had investigated as an anatomist. Anatomical and écorché studies of the skull and neck of an old man feature in this exhibition, and although they are not direct studies for the unfinished painting, the treatment of the muscles of the neck is very similar. Once his pictorial investigations were complete, there is every chance that Leonardo’s restless intellect wanted to move on.
In fact, Leonardo was fairly notorious for not completing commissions, and there are stories of wrangles with dissatisfied customers. He is also known to have been a terrible procrastinator – paintings would often be worked on in fits and starts, often stretching over several years. The Virgin of the Rocks, for instance, the version owned by the National Gallery, was started in about 1491-2 but wasn’t completed until 1506-8. However, the angel’s pointing finger, seen in the earlier Louvre version (pictured below, c 1483-5), is missing in the London version, suggesting that, rather than a change in composition, it may not have been completed, after all, even after that 14 year gap.
For Leonardo, it wasn't the craft of painting that held the most fascination, but the investigation into observable nature and its underlying principles. Painting as a profession was subordinate to the service of intellectual enquiry, and many of his drawings serve not as preparatory sketches for works of art, but to illustrate other interests - in engineering, in hydraulics, in anatomy, in optics. The sheer scope of his intellect can be found in his notebooks - thousands of pages in his close mirror writing.
Yet the National Gallery’s exhibition is the first ever to concentrate solely on Leonardo as a painter, not as a scientist or engineer or inventor of proto-helicopters and war tanks. And in so doing it brings together nine paintings produced in the years which saw him radically break with convention, introducing a startling naturalism to portraiture and bringing a dream-like, numinous quality to religious subject matter. These are the years in which he served as a court painter to Ludovico Maria Sforza, il Moro (“the Moor”), in the last two decades of the 15th century.
These works, rarely or never before seen together, are shown amongst Leonardo’s numerous preparatory sketches, which range in detail from rapid doodles made on the edges of scraps of paper to the meticulous and voluminously rendered. They are also shown alongside the paintings of a number of gifted followers, including Boltraffio, Leonardo’s most talented Milanese pupil. Indeed, among the three portraits on view in this exhibition, Leonardo’s Portrait of a Woman ("La belle ferronnière") (c 1493-5, Musée du Louvre, Paris, pictured below) has often been attributed to this younger artist.
La belle ferronnière (1493-5) - so called because it was once mistaken for a portrait of the celebrated mistress of François I, but now thought to depict Lucrezia Crivelli, mistress to Ludovico - is depicted half-length. This is in keeping with all of Leonardo’s portraits (of which only five are known). She is distanced from us by a parapet, and the whole picture speaks of both distance and detachment. Her compelling gaze seems at first to hold ours, yet peer closely and you’ll find that she is not really interested in us at all, but is looking somewhere just beyond us. She is rendered with incredible attention to texture and light, with the modelling of her face executed with great subtlety, but hers is an idealised, almost generalised beauty.
Though disdaining ours, La belle ferronnière’s cool gaze may just have settled on the youthful beauty of Cecilia Gallerani, The Lady with an Ermine (1489-90), who hangs on an adjacent wall. And well it might, for Gallerani is not only undoubtedly the exhibition’s showstopper, a breathtaking beauty in a most striking portrait; she was also the mistress of Ludovico when it was painted.
Departing from the strict profile pose traditionally used for Milanese portraits, she is seen in semi-profile, in a contrapposto pose. This gives an expression of movement and it also shows off the smooth length of her neck as she twists her head to gaze at something or someone outside the picture frame to her left. The line of Cecilia’s neck and head echo the sinuous line of the ermine’s long body, as do her eyes, directly in line with the creature’s, which is larger and more muscular than it would be in real life.
Furthermore, the ermine, which is both a pun on her surname and a reference to her lover (bestowed the Order of the Ermine by the King of Naples in 1486), is also an emblem of Cecilia’s purity, even though this 16-year-old mistress of the Duke may have been pregnant at the time the portrait was painted.
That small, exquisite portrait may easily rival the later Mona Lisa, yet to see the two Virgins of the Rock, facing one another in the same gallery, is a further reminder that such encounters can only be once-in-a-lifetime pleasures. With its dull glaze lifted in a recent restoration, the London version now looks much brighter, its golden, burnished colours coming through most brilliantly in the Virgin’s cloak and in the detail of the foreground foliage, as well as in the blue haze of the background. The Paris version, however, still remains by far the sweeter and more naturalistic.
Finally, we have Christ as Salvator Mundi (pictured right, from a private collection), painted from about 1499 onwards. This recent attribution, which is held in a private collection, shows the saviour Christ with his right hand held in a blessing, while the left holds a crystal orb. The tiny bubbles beneath the orb’s clear surface are painted with astonishing skill, but in contrast to its clarity, Christ’s face is seen as if through a gauze – as if, as the catalogue suggests, his face is imprinted on the veil of Saint Veronica or the cloth of Mandylion of Edessa.
This is a superb, not-to-be-missed exhibition, for which I would also recommend the beautifully written, hugely informative catalogue. It will do much to increase your engagement with this great master of the High Renaissance.
- Leonardo da Vinci: Painter at the Court of Milan at the National Gallery until 5 February, 2012
Share this article
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 7,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take an annual subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
more Visual arts
A modest but groundbreaking display brings together portraits of a great dynasty
A rich and multifaceted body of work that offers a modern twist on the memento mori
An exhibition that lends new insights and depth to the late photographer's work
Andrew Graham-Dixon begins an excellent trilogy about World War One artists with Paul Nash
Turner was a brilliantly radical artist, but was he of his time or outside it? Both, of course
Revelation of early Swedish woman artist opened magpie survey of abstract art
Tradit Tory or true revolutionary? Alastair Sooke ponders John Constable's heritage ahead of major V&A exhibition
The man who turned fashion photography into art
Headless 'terror' chickens, a naff baroque beach hut, and digging for gold
Introducing Unlimited, the Southbank's festival of work by deaf and disabled artists
Does James Fox have anything interesting to say? Judging from this series, no
Anticipating the independence referendum, questions of Scottish identity fill the air