tue 17/10/2017

The Glass Menagerie, Duke of York's | reviews, news & interviews

The Glass Menagerie, Duke of York's

The Glass Menagerie, Duke of York's

Tennessee Williams' first masterpiece gets the John Tiffany touch

And her mother came too: Michael Esper as Tom, Cherry Jones as Amanda and Brian J. Smith as Jimphoto: Johan Persson

The writing of Tennessee Williams, said his contemporary Arthur Miller, planted “the flag of beauty on the shores of commercial theatre”. This American production of Williams’s breakthrough play – a hit on Broadway and at the Edinburgh Festival last summer – does not disappoint in the beauty stakes, drawing both eye and ear to its chamber-work delicacy, translucent as one of Laura Wingfield’s glass animals.

The production is directed by John Tiffany, a creative force behind the West End's Harry Potter and the Cursed Child and, sure enough, inexplicable things happen here, too. Tom Wingfield (Michael Esper) is sitting chatting to us from the family couch when suddenly his sister Laura (Kate O’Flynn) appears in the seat beside him having squirmed through the seams of the upholstery. At mention of their mother, Cherry Jones steps from behind a screen like a magician’s assistant and, more perplexingly, the characters slip into brief shamanic trances. The women flick their wrists over the dining table as if enacting some dark sorcery while Tom, a budding writer, falls backwards from his typewriter, blown by an unseen force.

It’s a little outré, but perfectly of a piece with the expressionism in Williams’s writing. Tiffany’s chief strategy is to clear the play of period clutter. There is that typewriter, a phonograph and a single glass animal, but the family sit down to invisible meals, and the poverty of the Wingfield’s apartment in St Louis is suggested solely by an endless fire escape (design: Bob Crowley) that corkscrews skywards at an alarming angle. It’s a symbol of escape to who-knows-where for the Wingfield siblings, trapped not only by their domineering mother but also by self-pity.

Ageing southern belle Amanda Wingfield is traditionally played as a monster matriarch. She is without doubt overweeningly vain, recounting tales of her “17 gentleman callers” while aware that her plain, polio-damaged daughter is likely to be left on the shelf. But the marvellous Cherry Jones (something of a legend on the US stage) tones down the aggressive notes in Amanda’s register to bring more nuance to the character. Tom may rage against his mother’s interference (she even nags him about the way he chews his food), but as the two of them plot to procure a gentleman caller for Laura, he lays his head fondly on her shoulder. It’s complicated, this mother-and-son thing, as Williams well knew.Kate O'Flynn as LauraJones’s distinctive take on Amanda accentuates the positive: this energetic, still-handsome woman has been dealt blow after painful blow, and she’s not taking it lying down. Snobbish and overbearing she may be, but she’s a lioness in defence of her children. She won’t allow the word “cripple” anywhere near her club-footed daughter, and in the 1930s that was something.

Kate O’Flynn (pictured above) is particularly affecting as the damaged girl, matching her graceless gait with a voice that is equally unfortunate. Michael Esper’s Tom struggles to locate the Mississippi accent, but he catches perfectly the disabling outrage of a young man who believes himself to be a talented writer and is shocked on a daily basis to find himself working in a shoe warehouse.

The pressure on the play’s fourth and last character to put things right for the family is profound, but Tiffany resists it. As Laura’s “gentleman caller” Jim, Brian J. Smith gives a performance that is so close to sincere that we are tempted to believe it. We want to think there is good in the world, that people do have it in them to reach out to social oddities such as Laura, and even to fall in love with them. We hear Jim saying all the right things. She has pretty hair and eyes. She has nice hands. And we see poor Laura begin to emerge from the belief that she is worthless. But is Jim sincere? Or has he been reading Psychology: A Beginners Guide? In making Tom’s ambitious friend a putative pioneer of television, the playwright lays a clue.

All power to a director who preserves such subtle observations, and makes such a virtue of ambiguity. Nico Muhly’s incidental music – mysterious and glimmering – endorses the peculiar spell cast by this fine and authoritative production.

The pressure on the play’s fourth character to put things right for the family is profound, but this production resists it

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters