sun 19/11/2017

In Darkness | reviews, news & interviews

In Darkness

In Darkness

Agnieszka Holland's sepulchral film brings a remarkable story of Jewish survival to light

In Darkness: the film’s forays up into the city bring, literally, light relief

The world has heard of Schindler’s Jews, who were saved from the gas ovens by the patronage of an enlightened German industrialist. Socha’s Jews are not quite so celebrated. There are number of reasons for that. For a start, many fewer Jews were saved in this narrative, and their story has not found its own Thomas Kenneally - nor until now its Steven Spielberg. But most importantly their saviour would never be mistaken for any sort of moral pin-up, being a burglar and black marketer who stashed his booty in the sewers of Lvov.

A non-fiction book called In the Sewers of Lvov tells of Socha's Jews and their remarkable survival, but it was out of print when rookie scriptwriter David F Shannon bought Amazon’s last copy. The film which has finally brought their story to light is the work of Agnieszka Holland. The émigrée Polish director's grandparents were killed in the Warsaw ghetto and much of her early work - Angry Harvest (1985) and Europa Europa (1991) - focuses on the plight of Jews in the war. The first thing to say is that Holland is nothing if not true to the film’s title. When in 1943 the Lvov ghetto was cleared by the SS and their Ukrainian henchmen, briefly and brutally re-enacted here, a group of Jews escaped through the hole in the floor of a bar down into the city’s network of sewers. Thus much of In Darkness takes place in sepulchral half light, with only torches and candles to see by. Holland and her DoP Jola Dylewska make no concessions, so that the film’s forays up into the city bring, literally, light relief. When Socha (Robert Więckiewicz, superb) takes pity on a sickly child and thrusts her restoratively through a manhold for a dose of the real world, we are encouraged to feel something of her wonder.

Not much is known of the real Socha, so the script has to fill in the blanks as plausibly as it can. In Spielberg’s hands the redemptive arc of the story would have been worked with a great deal more signposting. Holland and Shannon are not afraid of complexities and shading. Mutual distrust is considerable. The weaselly Socha, helped by a young dim sidekick, is undoubtedly in it for the money - although he could earn as much by turning them all in - and by pre-arrangement he refuses to protect more than 11 of the large crowd of Jews he finds hiding. As for the rest, they don’t fare any better than the women he sees running naked and terrified through the forest at the start of the film when dragging his booty home from a break-in.

Holland flirts often and heartstoppingly with dread possibilities

But the Jews are hardly idealised either. Friction is provoked by sexual jealousies – the sewers where “everything smells of shit” and rats are legion does not put a stop to ceaseless desperate frotting – but also social distinctions. Class tension simmers between a rich German-speaking Mr Chiger (Herbert Knaup) who funds the group’s needs and the working-class Yiddish-speaking Mundek (Benno Fürmann), its slightly too chiselled natural leader.

And then there is a marital divide between Socha and his comely blonde wife (Kinga Preis), who is appalled at the danger he is putting themselves and their daughter in. But gradually as the invading thugs – personified by an old Ukrainian pal now working in uniform for the Nazi project - make life hell for everyone, Socha comes to feel almost trapped into personal responsibility for the stowaways in his care – even for Mundek whose distrust lingers.

The film takes its time – well north of two hours - to reach its cathartic and extremely moving climax. On the way Holland flirts often and heartstoppingly with dread possibilities, both for Socha and for the small group of Jews braving flood and famine, discovery and death and even, on the way, a pregnancy. Possibly to escape narrative suffocation, the story follows Mundek into a nearby workers’ camp – they have to crawl through the gates - where the commandant has a Jewish band playing Strauss waltz as he shoots the enfeebled. It’s grimly realised – Holland doesn't overdo the horrors, but doesn't stint either - but in the context of the narrative a slightly false trail. In Darkness has the odd such structural weakness imposed on it by claustrophobia. Perhaps these cost it the Academy Award for Best Foreign Film (which went to Iran’s A Separation). But it is nonetheless a powerful and honest voyage into the bowels of hell.

Watch the trailer to In Darkness

Socha comes to feel almost trapped into personal responsibility for the stowaways in his care

rating

Editor Rating: 
4
Average: 4 (1 vote)

Share this article

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters