Ballo della Regina/ La Sylphide, Royal Ballet | Dance reviews, news & interviews
Ballo della Regina/ La Sylphide, Royal Ballet
Sylph meets Scot. And magic happens
Ballo della Regina is a strange piece, for many reasons. A piece of minor Balanchine, it was created late in life for a dancer he clearly admired but who was not core to his vision. Strangest of all, he used music by Verdi, a composer whose music he had only choreographed to in his very early days as a journeyman opera-house ballet-master, when he did not get to choose.
So what does the piece tell us? Very little, really. Staged by Merrill Ashley, its original lead, it is efficient, neat, well-rehearsed. And I can see no real purpose to it. The curtain rises on a heart-liftingly familiar Balanchine opening, turquoise scrim, a corps of 12 women strung out like beads across the stage (pictured overleaf). They are joined by four soloists (Yuhui Choe and Beatriz Stix-Brunell dancing particularly beautifully), and then by the lead couple, Marianela Nuñez and Nehemiah Kish (pictured right, photo: Bill Cooper).
Nuñez performs technical feats of bravura skill in her fiendishly difficult steps (there seems to be barely a second when she is off point, and she is usually required to jump from and to point as well). Kish is not particularly well suited as her partner, or to this role: he is far too tall, and his extremely long torso makes him look awkward even when his steps are neat and clean; in his jumps his arms wave distractingly, and he seems uncentred even when he is not.
But it is the piece itself where the trouble lies. It has no real impetus, no forward motion driven by the music. A ballet number from the opera Don Carlos, it stops and starts in for a drama that no longer takes place; it rises to a climax, hails a procession that does not materialise; the brass bombast must sound wonderful accompanied by opera staging, but when wisps of dancers skim the stage, it seems foolishly overblown. All credit, therefore, to everyone on stage for making the action seem more purposeful than it is.
Share this article
Subscribe to theartsdesk.com
Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.
To take an annual subscription now simply click here.
And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?
Exile-themed circus show is rather too serious
Too much sugar in Ashton double bill
Spectacular dance fireworks make this hoariest and silliest of Russian classics worth seeing
Hypnotic exploration of Indian myth from a female perspective
A royal gem in the Linbury Studio Theatre
Christopher Hampson's fairytale fills the seasonal family ballet slot nicely
Highlights of the last calendar year
Likeable dancers deliver Christmas cheer despite the mice
Wacky and delightful dance theatre adaptation of classic fairytale
A vampiric twist on the Tchaikovsky ballet makes for an evening of mixed success
The ballet star takes his final bow in a self-curated gala that raises the roof
Faultless production works its magic afresh