tue 19/08/2014

BBC Proms: Vienna Philharmonic, Haitink | Classical music reviews, news & interviews

BBC Proms: Vienna Philharmonic, Haitink

Haydn's visit to London fails to stir but Strauss's Alpine stroll more than delivers

A mountain to climb: Bernard Haitink conducts the Vienna Philharmonic© BBC/Chris Christodoulou

The Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra can play Haydn’s last symphony - No 104 “London” - in its sleep but that is not, I hasten to add, the impression one wants to take away from any performance of it and especially not in the city that inspired it. The music tells us that Haydn had a rather better time in our capital than Bernard Haitink would have us believe but this rather dogged account on the penultimate night of the Prom season seemed to suppress the work’s genial good humour and pre-empt most of its surprises with a one-size-fits-all approach. Haydn was many things - dull was not one of them.

Part of the problem was the strictness of Haitink’s time-beating and the plumpness of the sound where from my seat in the rear sector of the stalls a heaviness pervaded with rhythm and articulation not as sharply defined as one is now accustomed to in our stylistically aware times. The pomp and circumstance was there (albeit a night early) but what didn’t register in any way, shape, or form was the music’s charm. Affection, too, was at a premium and time and again - and I’m thinking particularly of the violins‘ gorgeous little ritornello-like phrase in the slow movement - one so wanted Haitink to give way and allow a little more room for these players to savour what comes so naturally to them.

The first glimpse of alpine waterfalls was astonishing

Haitink returned only once to acknowledge the generously protracted applause. He was no doubt conserving his energy: he had a mountain to climb - or, to be more precise, Strauss’s Alpine Symphony. We were now well and truly in the foothills of Vienna Philharmonic heaven and as the trombones sounded their first intimation of the splendours that lay in wait above, all that was required of the venerable and venerated maestro was a very real sense of this music finding its own space. He delivered. And as the early morning mists cleared in preparation for Strauss‘ thrilling “reveal” those fabled Vienna violins soared and nine horns (with that characteristic wide-bore sound) opened up the first of many fabulous vistas.

Up through the canyons we went with the distant sound of London Brass providing only two short of the 12 offstage horns specified by Strauss. The first glimpse of alpine waterfalls (Strauss working wonders with torrential high violins, piccolos, and glockenspiel) was astonishing and at the summit the passage Strauss called simply “Vision” had the VPO’s intrepid first trumpet nailing the first of many stratospheric bullseyes and the Albert Hall’s mighty organ buttressing the sound from below. I’m still wondering how adjustments were made to deploy the organ when this orchestra is one of a select few playing at a notably higher pitch. One recalls a number of Proms where an electronic job was brought in for just this reason.

Special effects abound in the Alpine Symphony and the wind machine went into overdrive as the mother of all storms disrupted the descent. The climactic quadruple-forte with two thunder sheets shaken, rattled, and rolled was pretty stupendous. But this piece isn’t entirely about Technicolor spectacle and, as the philosophical apotheosis arrived with all its pantheistic overtones in praise of man’s relationship with nature, this orchestra and conductor assumed ownership of it and shared a level of profundity that it so rarely achieves.

The climactic quadruple-forte with two thunder sheets shaken, rattled, and rolled was pretty stupendous

Share this article

Comments

Are you sure that Haitink

Are you sure that Haitink returned once to acknowledge the Haydn? I didn't think he came back at all. And it would be nice to know why, but given his sprightly appearance throughout the two Proms, I don't think conservation of physical resources can be the reason. Rather look to the sullen and miserable faces of the orchestra in the Strauss - especially that of leader Kuechl, who, if he hadn't been summoned to the manager's office (aka Bernie's dressing room) in the interval for the hairdryer treatment, should have been. Not that it made a difference; he was still regularly playing a quarter-beat ahead of everyone else on those rare occasions when they were playing together. I found the laziness of the playing unfathomable. It's not as if Bernie doesn't have a clear beat. If they can't or won't follow it, they're still the Vienna Phil, well able at least to play with each other. Not on Friday, though. If the Strauss sounded less uncoordinated than the Haydn, it was only because the brass (with, again, uncharacteristic brutality) made discretion the better part of valour and covered everyone else's mistakes.

Kyburz74 - you obviously have

Kyburz74 - you obviously have a problem with the VPO whom you seem to think of as little better than some amateur group. More fool you. And who is 'Bernie'? Some personal friend? Sheer impertinence more likely. By the way, the other 5999 in the audience thought it was pretty wonderful and a privilege to be there.

actually 5998 - (and probably

actually 5998 - (and probably less) The Haydn was a shocker ! Little wonder he didn't return to the stage. Certainly had the orchestra puzzled - one of the bass players looked like he was going to lead a search party ! Alpine was better - but never reality got off the ground (mind the pun). Bruckner 9 the previous night was the high water mark of the two nights.

A nice review, Mr Seckerson.

A nice review, Mr Seckerson. The pedant in me just has to point out that the Vienna horn has a narrower bore than the modern double horn!

Add comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Use to create page breaks.

More information about formatting options

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 7,000 pieces, we're asking for £2.95 per month or £25 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters