fri 23/08/2019

Sargent: Portraits of Artists and Friends, National Portrait Gallery | reviews, news & interviews

Sargent: Portraits of Artists and Friends, National Portrait Gallery

Sargent: Portraits of Artists and Friends, National Portrait Gallery

Tender feeling and empathy pervade the work of this grand master of the swagger portrait

Sargent's portrait of his teacher, Carolus-Duran, 1879Sterling and Francine Clark Institute, Williamstown, MA

Oh, Dr Pozzi! This gorgeous man is garbed in a red wool, full-length robe, almost completely obscuring his elegantly gleaming white shirt. The shirt collar frames his face, casting light, and its frilled cuffs emphasise his improbably long-fingered hands in a lively gesture. The most fashionable gynaecologist in Paris, a pioneering doctor, around whom rumours swirled of decadence and legendary love-making – Sarah Bernhardt was rumoured to be a long-time mistress –  he is the subject of a masterly full-length portrait by the precocious, formidably talented John Singer Sargent (1856-1925), and the poster boy for the current exhibition. 

Sargent, Dr Pozzi at Home, 1881; Armand Hammer Collection, Hammer Museum, Los AngelesThe doctor's pose (Portrait of Dr Pozzi, 1881, pictured left) is almost one of 17th-century formality, even theatricality but the costume – is he about to go out or preparing for bed? – adds an undoubted frisson of edgy sensuality, emphasised by the subject’s irresistible glamour.

Sargent was prolific – some 600 portraits, not to mention perhaps as many as 1,500 paintings and watercolours of other subjects – and became the artist of choice for the élite in political, intellectual and artistic spheres. An American, he was born in Italy, educated in France, looked like a German, spoke, it was said, like an Englishman, and painted like a Spaniard. He was born in Florence to East Coast America grandees – his father, a doctor, was persuaded by his Europhile wife that he needed to be in Europe for his health. He was to keep his American citizenship all his life although he only paid his first visit to the USA in its centennial year of 1876 when he was already 20.

He was widely travelled, multilingual, a gifted pianist and musician, and as a painter above all influenced by such as Velazquez, for the congnoscenti then just coming back into fashion. He was the grand master of the so-called swagger portrait, commissioned to portray the great and the good of Paris, England and eventually America, from the Vanderbilts to the Rockefellers, the Boston Brahmins to the British aristocracy. His very facility with paint, the wealth of flattering albeit staggeringly skilled society portraits led eventually, posthumously, to a shadow on his reputation, as the avant-garde eclipsed the more traditional, however expert. Sargent seemed perhaps shallow compared to the Impressionists, and to Whistler

Sargent  is supposed to have remarked that every time he painted a portrait he lost a friend

But the great pleasures offered by his sheer captivating skill with paint has led to a reversal of critical fortunes. The huge exhibition in London at Tate Britain in 1998 provided fascinating insights into the ruling élite, and delight in bravura expertise. 

This exhibition should persuade even more of us that it is not just the creamy swathes of white paint, the sheen of satin and silk, the softness of a woman’s skin, the uncannily wrinkled neck of the old, that is so beguiling. The commissioned portraits are often but not always psychologically penetrating. But now at the National Portrait Gallery we see in sharp focus an intimate side of the artist’s milieu. 

Here is the last of the old masters in a new guise: revealing, affecting, human and humane. Here are the literati, the intelligentsia, the actors, poets, writers, musicians, artists, among whom he moved and in a very real sense had his being. His fellow artists are almost all minor ones, but included here are two formidable geniuses: Rodin and Monet. He was a very close friend of the latter.

Sargent is supposed to have remarked that every time he painted a portrait he lost a friend; but what is remarkable here is the evident empathy and interest, and the persuasive insights. The full-length portrait of the young, and very pale aesthete W Graham Robertson,wrapped up in a huge overcoat – huge hands almost fluttering, an ancient beribboned dog in a basket at his feet – shows a startled sensitivity. The Pailleron children, Edouard and Marie Louise, whose parents were leaders of the Paris salon, evidently had to sit endlessly for the artist. They are beautifully dressed, their expressions wonderfully sulky and resentful, quietly furious, and bordering on mutinous.

Henry James said he had a knockdown insolence of talent: Sargent’s portrait of his teacher Carolus-Duran, 1879, (main picture) is the painting that inspired the comment, and yet, elegantly languid as the subject is, it seems that the portrait is irradiated with respectful affection and admiration; indeed it is so inscribed by the artist, who was only 24 when he painted this tour de force.

Here too there are homely portraits, of people who seem extraordinarily vivid and alive: his compatriot the artist Charles Stuart Forbes in one such, curiously wet mouthed, gazing out with a quiet determination. His paintings of artists can be quietly if affectionately sardonic. In The Fountain, Villa Torloni, 1907, the American artist Wilfred de Glehn lounges, dozing while his artist wife Jane, perched on a balustrade, paints away, concentrating hard on the garden scene, a contrast to her husband’s studied indolence. 

Sargent, An Artist in his Studio, 1904; Museum of Fine Arts, BostonIn An Out-of-Doors Study, c.1889, Madame Helleu is patently bored and fed up as she listlessly semi-naps next to her husband Paul, who is totally absorbed as he sketches by the river in the Worcestershire countryside. An Artist in His Studio,1904 (pictured above), shows us the bearded Antonio Raffele with palette, brooding in front of his unfinished landscape; the jumbled sheets of the unmade bed next to him are a virtuoso of creamy, shadowy whites.

What is so touchingly evident, in a way that contradicts the conventional view of Sargent, is the tender feeling, the personal empathy, that pervades almost all of the portraits here on view. 

Sargent, Henry James, 1913; National Portrait GalleryPerhaps not altogether surprisingly the most reticent, austere and reserved renderings are the self-portraits: he is enigmatic, impenetrable even to his own brush. Yet it is to Sargent that we owe, for example, definitive and memorable depictions of, say, Henry James, (portrait pictured left, painted in 1913), the fellow American who persuaded the artist to leave Paris to make his career in London. James is smug, formidable, but there is a curious hint of uncertainty, and an understanding perhaps of the kind of façade that James himself could so readily portray in words.

Although Sargent never married, or had, as far as is known, any sexual or emotional liaison (the gay world continually tries to co-opt him) he is served very well by his collateral descendants, among whom is Richard Ormond, the art historian who is the co-author of the outstanding, multi-volumed catalogue raisonée of Sargent’s oeuvre, and a curator along with those at the Metropolitan Museum where this show, in even more ample form, will travel.

Comments

I have been in love with Sargent since I saw a magnificent exhibit in Washington D.C. in 1999 - and was determined then to write a novel celebrating his genius (which I did and had published in 2013: Portraits of an Artist). It's a fictional account of his years in Paris leading up to the debacle and scandal of Madame X, and also the wonder that is the Daughters of Edward Darley Boit. I'm so glad that he's finally getting the praise and attention that eluded him for so long after his death -- thanks almost completely to his hard-working and determined great-nephew, Richard Ormond. Thanks for a lovely article! I long to be in London to see the exhibit!

Add comment

Subscribe to theartsdesk.com

Thank you for continuing to read our work on theartsdesk.com. For unlimited access to every article in its entirety, including our archive of more than 10,000 pieces, we're asking for £3.95 per month or £30 per year. We feel it's a very good deal, and hope you do too.

To take an annual subscription now simply click here.

And if you're looking for that extra gift for a friend or family member, why not treat them to a theartsdesk.com gift subscription?

newsletter

Get a weekly digest of our critical highlights in your inbox each Thursday!

Simply enter your email address in the box below

View previous newsletters